[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug gold/16773] Cannot process a R_X86_64_TPOFF32 against .tdata
From: |
rafael.espindola at gmail dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug gold/16773] Cannot process a R_X86_64_TPOFF32 against .tdata |
Date: |
Mon, 06 Oct 2014 12:36:00 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16773
--- Comment #3 from Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <rafael.espindola a
t gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Cary Coutant from comment #2)
> Fixed on trunk.
>
> How did you generate test.o? Can the compiler generate the relocation
> against the .tdata section symbol, or did you do this through assembler?
If
> I can make a test case for this without resorting to assembly code, it wo
uld
> be nice.
I found this (and pr16794) while trying to find out if llvm could produce t
hese
relocations. It worked with bfd, but not with gold.
Thanks for fixing this bug. I will update the comment on llvm's source code
so
that it can start producing them at some point.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Bug gold/16773] Cannot process a R_X86_64_TPOFF32 against .tdata,
rafael.espindola at gmail dot com <=