[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug gas/18347] On ARM, "LDR =something" with missing destination regist
From: |
solrabizna at gmail dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug gas/18347] On ARM, "LDR =something" with missing destination register is silently ignored |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Apr 2015 19:31:12 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18347
--- Comment #3 from Solra Bizna <solrabizna at gmail dot com> ---
Ah! That explains what's happening.
Just tried the patch. It works great.
As far as adding some way to suppress the warning... Instruction set extensions
mean that an acceptable symbol one day will cause a warning tomorrow. Having
some way to suppress the warning would be good. If it's possible, I'd suggest
keeping the warning on definitions of the form "X=Y", and having no warning on
the rather more explicit (but equivalent, right?) ".set X, Y". If the user
really wants a symbol with that kind of name, they oughtn't mind being explicit
about it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug gas/18347] New: On ARM, "LDR =something" with missing destination register is silently ignored, solrabizna at gmail dot com, 2015/04/28
- [Bug gas/18347] On ARM, "LDR =something" with missing destination register is silently ignored, nickc at redhat dot com, 2015/04/29
- [Bug gas/18347] On ARM, "LDR =something" with missing destination register is silently ignored, nickc at redhat dot com, 2015/04/29
- [Bug gas/18347] On ARM, "LDR =something" with missing destination register is silently ignored,
solrabizna at gmail dot com <=
- [Bug gas/18347] On ARM, "LDR =something" with missing destination register is silently ignored, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org, 2015/04/30
- [Bug gas/18347] On ARM, "LDR =something" with missing destination register is silently ignored, nickc at redhat dot com, 2015/04/30