[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/11539] ld --gc-sections should work for PE-COFF on MinGW
From: |
eduardo.marcovecchio at gmail dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug ld/11539] ld --gc-sections should work for PE-COFF on MinGW |
Date: |
Thu, 02 Jul 2015 15:18:41 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11539
Eduardo Luis Marcovecchio <eduardo.marcovecchio at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |address@hidden
| |com
--- Comment #12 from Eduardo Luis Marcovecchio <eduardo.marcovecchio at gmail
dot com> ---
Please, no news on this subject yet? I'm sure this is a very important feature
for us Windows GCC users (MingW / TDM), and I would help if I had the
knowledge.
We have tons of people on the internet talking about how GCC ports to Windows
generate bloated code in comparison to MSVC, and this single implementation
would help a lot, mainly on projects linked against big libs, like wxWidgets,
QT and others.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug ld/11539] ld --gc-sections should work for PE-COFF on MinGW,
eduardo.marcovecchio at gmail dot com <=
- [Bug ld/11539] ld --gc-sections should work for PE-COFF on MinGW, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org, 2015/07/03
- [Bug ld/11539] ld --gc-sections should work for PE-COFF on MinGW, nickc at redhat dot com, 2015/07/03
- [Bug ld/11539] ld --gc-sections should work for PE-COFF on MinGW, eduardo.marcovecchio at gmail dot com, 2015/07/03
- [Bug ld/11539] ld --gc-sections should work for PE-COFF on MinGW, vanboxem.ruben at gmail dot com, 2015/07/03
- [Bug ld/11539] ld --gc-sections should work for PE-COFF on MinGW, nickc at redhat dot com, 2015/07/03