[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug gold/19353] ld-new: internal error in relocate_tls, at ../../binuti
From: |
ccoutant at gmail dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug gold/19353] ld-new: internal error in relocate_tls, at ../../binutils/gold/aarch64.cc:7418 |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Jan 2016 07:59:06 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19353
Cary Coutant <ccoutant at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ccoutant at gmail dot com
Assignee|shenhan at google dot com |ccoutant at gmail dot
com
--- Comment #6 from Cary Coutant <ccoutant at gmail dot com> ---
In fact, if I compile the example for x86-64 with -mtls-dialect=gnu2, I see the
same failure. In x86_64.cc, we don't check for tls_segment when optimizing
R_X86_64_TLSGD to IE, but we do have a bogus check when optimizing
R_X86_64_GOTPC32_TLSDESC or R_X86_64_TLSDESC_CALL. We have a similar problem in
i386.cc. It looks like the aarch64.cc target simply inherited the bug from
x86_64.cc.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug gold/19353] ld-new: internal error in relocate_tls, at ../../binutils/gold/aarch64.cc:7418, kristof.beyls at gmail dot com, 2016/01/05
- [Bug gold/19353] ld-new: internal error in relocate_tls, at ../../binutils/gold/aarch64.cc:7418, shenhan at google dot com, 2016/01/07
- [Bug gold/19353] ld-new: internal error in relocate_tls, at ../../binutils/gold/aarch64.cc:7418, ccoutant at gmail dot com, 2016/01/12
- [Bug gold/19353] ld-new: internal error in relocate_tls, at ../../binutils/gold/aarch64.cc:7418,
ccoutant at gmail dot com <=
- [Bug gold/19353] ld-new: internal error in relocate_tls, at ../../binutils/gold/aarch64.cc:7418, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org, 2016/01/12
- [Bug gold/19353] ld-new: internal error in relocate_tls, at ../../binutils/gold/aarch64.cc:7418, ccoutant at gmail dot com, 2016/01/12