[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/19571] Buffer Overflow in libbfd
From: |
nickc at redhat dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/19571] Buffer Overflow in libbfd |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Feb 2016 11:05:35 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19571
--- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> ---
Hi Markus,
> I don't think it makes any sense to fuzz the demangler with arbitrary binary
> files.
The tools (nm, objdump) should be able to cope though. When I tried running nm
for example I received this error message (after a long pause):
./binutils/nm-new: out of memory allocating 18446744071629176800 bytes after
a total of 3221147648 bytes
We ought to be able to better than this. Or rather the libiberty demangler
should be able to cope better.
Cheers
Nick
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug binutils/19571] New: Buffer Overflow in libbfd, boehme.marcel at gmail dot com, 2016/02/05
- [Bug binutils/19571] Buffer Overflow in libbfd, boehme.marcel at gmail dot com, 2016/02/05
- [Bug binutils/19571] Buffer Overflow in libbfd, nickc at redhat dot com, 2016/02/05
- [Bug binutils/19571] Buffer Overflow in libbfd, boehme.marcel at gmail dot com, 2016/02/05
- [Bug binutils/19571] Buffer Overflow in libbfd, markus at trippelsdorf dot de, 2016/02/05
- [Bug binutils/19571] Buffer Overflow in libbfd,
nickc at redhat dot com <=
- [Bug binutils/19571] Buffer Overflow in libbfd, markus at trippelsdorf dot de, 2016/02/05