[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug gold/19567] Symbol_value::value doesn't support x32 overflow check
From: |
ccoutant at gmail dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug gold/19567] Symbol_value::value doesn't support x32 overflow check |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Feb 2016 17:51:04 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19567
--- Comment #9 from Cary Coutant <ccoutant at gmail dot com> ---
> My test here doesn't follow any programming model and is independent of
> x32 or x86-64:
>
> address@hidden pr19567]$ cat x.s
> .globl _start
> _start:
> mov $_start,%rax
> mov _start,%rax
> address@hidden pr19567]$ make
> as -o x.o x.s
> ld.gold -Ttext-segment 0x80000000 -o x x.o
With today's patches to add overflow checking, this now gives relocation
overflow errors for x86_64:
$ ../../ld-new -Ttext-segment=0x80000000 x64.o
x64.o(.text+0x3): error: relocation overflow
x64.o(.text+0xb): error: relocation overflow
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree about x32.
> > $ ../../ld-new -m elf32_x86_64 -Ttext-segment=0x80000000 z.o
> > $ objdump -d a.out
> >
> > a.out: file format elf32-x86-64
> >
> >
> > Disassembly of section .text:
> >
> > 80000074 <_start>:
> > 80000074: 48 b8 74 00 00 80 00 movabs $0x80000074,%rax
> > 8000007b: 00 00 00
> > 8000007e: 48 a1 74 00 00 80 00 movabs 0x80000074,%rax
> > 80000085: 00 00 00
> >
> > Here, 0x80000074 should have been sign-extended when we applied the
> > relocations.
>
> No, it shouldn't.
Are you going to change the psABI document?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug gold/19567] New: Symbol_value::value doesn't support x32 overflow check, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2016/02/04
- [Bug gold/19567] Symbol_value::value doesn't support x32 overflow check, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2016/02/04
- [Bug gold/19567] Symbol_value::value doesn't support x32 overflow check, ccoutant at gmail dot com, 2016/02/04
- [Bug gold/19567] Symbol_value::value doesn't support x32 overflow check, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2016/02/04
- [Bug gold/19567] Symbol_value::value doesn't support x32 overflow check, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2016/02/04
- [Bug gold/19567] Symbol_value::value doesn't support x32 overflow check, ccoutant at gmail dot com, 2016/02/04
- [Bug gold/19567] Symbol_value::value doesn't support x32 overflow check, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2016/02/04
- [Bug gold/19567] Symbol_value::value doesn't support x32 overflow check, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2016/02/04
- [Bug gold/19567] Symbol_value::value doesn't support x32 overflow check, ccoutant at gmail dot com, 2016/02/04
- [Bug gold/19567] Symbol_value::value doesn't support x32 overflow check, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2016/02/05
- [Bug gold/19567] Symbol_value::value doesn't support x32 overflow check,
ccoutant at gmail dot com <=
- [Bug gold/19567] Symbol_value::value doesn't support x32 overflow check, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2016/02/05
- [Bug gold/19567] Symbol_value::value doesn't support x32 overflow check, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2016/02/06
- [Bug gold/19567] Symbol_value::value doesn't support x32 overflow check, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org, 2016/02/06
- [Bug gold/19567] Symbol_value::value doesn't support x32 overflow check, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2016/02/06
- [Bug gold/19567] Symbol_value::value doesn't support x32 overflow check, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2016/02/06