[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/19661] New: [libopcodes] [x86] Lock prefixes are allowed e
From: |
njholcomb at wi dot rr.com |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/19661] New: [libopcodes] [x86] Lock prefixes are allowed even when they SIGILL |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:44:59 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19661
Bug ID: 19661
Summary: [libopcodes] [x86] Lock prefixes are allowed even when
they SIGILL
Product: binutils
Version: 2.27 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: njholcomb at wi dot rr.com
Target Milestone: ---
Lock prefixes are also allowed even when they cause an Illegal Instruction
signal. Lock prefixes should require a memory operand, but libopcodes will
produce code like:
lock mov bh, 0x9f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug binutils/19661] New: [libopcodes] [x86] Lock prefixes are allowed even when they SIGILL,
njholcomb at wi dot rr.com <=