[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/19739] ld.bfd performance regression
From: |
amodra at gmail dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug ld/19739] ld.bfd performance regression |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Feb 2016 23:54:15 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19739
--- Comment #11 from Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com> ---
Ah, yes ld -r will get lots of orphans when linking -ffunction-sections
objects, and my pr19162 fix is quite expensive. Patch approved, but please
move the comment down to just before "place = NULL" rather than into the new
!bfd_link_relocatable block.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug ld/19739] ld.bfd performance regression, (continued)
- [Bug ld/19739] ld.bfd performance regression, address@hidden, 2016/02/27
- [Bug ld/19739] ld.bfd performance regression, markus at trippelsdorf dot de, 2016/02/27
- [Bug ld/19739] ld.bfd performance regression, address@hidden, 2016/02/28
- [Bug ld/19739] ld.bfd performance regression, markus at trippelsdorf dot de, 2016/02/28
- [Bug ld/19739] ld.bfd performance regression, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2016/02/28
- [Bug ld/19739] ld.bfd performance regression, address@hidden, 2016/02/28
- [Bug ld/19739] ld.bfd performance regression, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2016/02/28
- [Bug ld/19739] ld.bfd performance regression, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2016/02/29
- [Bug ld/19739] ld.bfd performance regression, amodra at gmail dot com, 2016/02/29
- [Bug ld/19739] ld.bfd performance regression, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2016/02/29
- [Bug ld/19739] ld.bfd performance regression,
amodra at gmail dot com <=