|
From: | rafael.espindola at gmail dot com |
Subject: | [Bug gold/19823] New: gold doesn't consider copy reloc of protected symbols |
Date: | Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:28:11 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19823 Bug ID: 19823 Summary: gold doesn't consider copy reloc of protected symbols Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gold Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com Reporter: rafael.espindola at gmail dot com CC: ian at airs dot com Target Milestone: --- Given local: .global internal .internal internal internal: .global hidden .hidden hidden hidden: .global protected .protected protected protected .global default default: .quad local .quad internal .quad hidden .quad protected .quad default and linking with ld test.o -o test.so -shared gold and bfd agree on every relocation, except for protected where bfd produces 000000000268 000100000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000250 protected + 0 and gold produces 0000000002a0 000000000008 R_X86_64_RELATIVE 288 The issue is that protected symbols cat still show up in copy relocations and in undefined plt entries. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |