[Bug ld/21402] i386: indirect5 failures

[amodra at gmail dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21402

Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |---

--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com> ---
xfail is wrong.  The testcases are not artificial, but are distilled from
real-world code.  The classical example is where "time" or "times" is defined
as a variable in an executable, clashing with functions of the same name in
libc.

Comment #2 even gives a clue as how to properly fix the problem.  "bar" does
*not* need to be dynamic have a GOT entry initialized to its address.  How do
you think GOT entries are initialized for local symbols?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.