[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/22249] objdump --dwarf-start can be very slow
From: |
mark at klomp dot org |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/22249] objdump --dwarf-start can be very slow |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Oct 2017 09:50:21 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22249
Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org> ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #2)
> * According to the documentation the --dwarf-start=N command line option
> (which sets the dwarf_start_die variable) specifies the *number* of the DIE
> at which output should start, not the starting address referenced by the
> DIE.
>
> I think that this may be a mistake in the documentation however, as this
> does not appear to match the behaviour of the code. Either that, or the
> documentation is correct and the code is wrong. From the way that the
> documentation is written however, it would appear that the code may be at
> fault.
I made the same observations when a request was made to add similar options to
eu-readelf. There are a couple of other odd corner case behaviours too:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22250#c1
I think the documentation could certainly be improved/corrected.
Making it stop at the end of the CU also seems like a good improvement.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug binutils/22249] New: objdump --dwarf-start can be very slow, tromey at sourceware dot org, 2017/10/04
- [Bug binutils/22249] objdump --dwarf-start can be very slow, tromey at sourceware dot org, 2017/10/06
- [Bug binutils/22249] objdump --dwarf-start can be very slow, nickc at redhat dot com, 2017/10/09
- [Bug binutils/22249] objdump --dwarf-start can be very slow,
mark at klomp dot org <=
- [Bug binutils/22249] objdump --dwarf-start can be very slow, tromey at sourceware dot org, 2017/10/09
- [Bug binutils/22249] objdump --dwarf-start can be very slow, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org, 2017/10/10
- [Bug binutils/22249] objdump --dwarf-start can be very slow, nickc at redhat dot com, 2017/10/10
- [Bug binutils/22249] objdump --dwarf-start can be very slow, tromey at sourceware dot org, 2017/10/10
- [Bug binutils/22249] objdump --dwarf-start can be very slow, nickc at redhat dot com, 2017/10/10
- [Bug binutils/22249] objdump --dwarf-start can be very slow, tromey at sourceware dot org, 2017/10/10
- [Bug binutils/22249] objdump --dwarf-start can be very slow, nickc at redhat dot com, 2017/10/10
- [Bug binutils/22249] objdump --dwarf-start can be very slow, tromey at sourceware dot org, 2017/10/10
- [Bug binutils/22249] objdump --dwarf-start can be very slow, mjw at fedoraproject dot org, 2017/10/11
- [Bug binutils/22249] objdump --dwarf-start can be very slow, mjw at fedoraproject dot org, 2017/10/11