[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/22444] Incorrect note padding check
From: |
hjl.tools at gmail dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/22444] Incorrect note padding check |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Nov 2017 10:32:54 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22444
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #3)
> Fact is everyone is assuming word-alignment for notes. This is exacerbated
> by the fact that the note header consists of 3 words even for 64-bit
> objects, thus xword alignment doesn't make sense here. IMHO this is really
> a bug in the gabi docs.
When there are 64-bit values in a note, 64-bit alignment is better.
Again, this isn't a big issue since the note alignment is the alignment
of segment/section.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug binutils/22444] New: Incorrect note padding check, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2017/11/15
- [Bug binutils/22444] Incorrect note padding check, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2017/11/15
- [Bug binutils/22444] Incorrect note padding check, fweimer at redhat dot com, 2017/11/15
- [Bug binutils/22444] Incorrect note padding check, fweimer at redhat dot com, 2017/11/15
- [Bug binutils/22444] Incorrect note padding check, address@hidden, 2017/11/16
- [Bug binutils/22444] Incorrect note padding check, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2017/11/16
- [Bug binutils/22444] Incorrect note padding check,
hjl.tools at gmail dot com <=
- [Bug binutils/22444] Incorrect note padding check, address@hidden, 2017/11/16
- [Bug binutils/22444] Incorrect note padding check, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2017/11/16
- [Bug binutils/22444] Incorrect note padding check, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2017/11/16
- [Bug binutils/22444] Incorrect note padding check, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2017/11/16
- [Bug binutils/22444] Incorrect note padding check, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2017/11/24
- [Bug binutils/22444] Incorrect note padding check, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org, 2017/11/24