[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug gas/21700] powerpc-ibm-aix6.1.0.0 fails with unresolved symbols
From: |
james.reynolds at cristie dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug gas/21700] powerpc-ibm-aix6.1.0.0 fails with unresolved symbols |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Mar 2018 09:21:23 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21700
--- Comment #8 from James Reynolds <james.reynolds at cristie dot com> ---
(In reply to James Reynolds from comment #7)
> (In reply to Rizwan Macknojia from comment #6)
> > Any update on this issue. I am creating a AIX cross-compiler on linux and
> > hitting the similar issue.
> >
> > Using
> > binutils 2.29
> > gcc 7.2
> > target powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.0.0
>
> None I'm afraid. I've been dragged away to other projects (and have a new
> baby, so no personal time either!) but we are looking at much more AIX
> development in 2018. I've had 2 personal emails about this too - so there is
> definite interest.
>
> After this though there are a few linker issues too and I still need to get
> the exception mechanism working. I'll update in January, and possibly make
> an AIX fork to be merged back when this is operational.
I've now fixed the RBR_26 problem - so the relocations now match IBM's
relocations exactly. This is in a fork here:
https://github.com/JamesReynolds/binutils-gdb
Unfortunately this was not the cause of exceptions not being caught. I think
something is mis-calculated in .gcc_except_table. However, I think this bug
could be closed if this change could be merged. I'll start the procedure for
that today.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug gas/21700] powerpc-ibm-aix6.1.0.0 fails with unresolved symbols,
james.reynolds at cristie dot com <=