[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/25207] New: ld: support --image-base= for elf (and -Ttext-segmen
From: |
i at maskray dot me |
Subject: |
[Bug ld/25207] New: ld: support --image-base= for elf (and -Ttext-segment -z separate-code strangeness) |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Nov 2019 23:26:29 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25207
Bug ID: 25207
Summary: ld: support --image-base= for elf (and -Ttext-segment
-z separate-code strangeness)
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: i at maskray dot me
Target Milestone: ---
% cat a.c
int main() {}
% gcc -fuse-ld=bfd a.c -Wl,-Ttext-segment,0x300000 -z noseparate-code -o a;
readelf -Wl a
...
Type Offset VirtAddr PhysAddr FileSiz MemSiz
Flg Align
PHDR 0x000040 0x0000000000300040 0x0000000000300040 0x0001f8
0x0001f8 R 0x8
INTERP 0x000238 0x0000000000300238 0x0000000000300238 0x00001c
0x00001c R 0x1
[Requesting program interpreter: /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2]
LOAD 0x000000 0x0000000000300000 0x0000000000300000 0x0007a8
0x0007a8 R E 0x1000
LOAD 0x000e18 0x0000000000301e18 0x0000000000301e18 0x000210
0x000218 RW 0x1000
...
When -z separate-code is specified, there will be two R PT_LOAD. Notably,
-Ttext-segment specifies the address of the first R, instead of the text
segment (RX).
Or we may argue that the traditional "text segment" includes both the first R
and the RX...
% gcc -fuse-ld=bfd a.c -Wl,-Ttext-segment,0x300000 -z separate-code -o a;
readelf -Wl a
...
Type Offset VirtAddr PhysAddr FileSiz MemSiz
Flg Align
PHDR 0x000040 0x0000000000300040 0x0000000000300040 0x000268
0x000268 R 0x8
INTERP 0x0002a8 0x00000000003002a8 0x00000000003002a8 0x00001c
0x00001c R 0x1
[Requesting program interpreter: /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2]
LOAD 0x000000 0x0000000000300000 0x0000000000300000 0x000530
0x000530 R 0x1000
LOAD 0x001000 0x0000000000301000 0x0000000000301000 0x00019d
0x00019d R E 0x1000
LOAD 0x002000 0x0000000000302000 0x0000000000302000 0x000148
0x000148 R 0x1000
LOAD 0x002e18 0x0000000000303e18 0x0000000000303e18 0x000210
0x000218 RW 0x1000
...
As a better name for specifying the base address, we can introduce a new elf
option --image-base=0x300000 (it exists in pe). The LLVM linker lld has
supported --image-base since 2016-07-12 (https://reviews.llvm.org/D22116).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Bug ld/25207] New: ld: support --image-base= for elf (and -Ttext-segment -z separate-code strangeness),
i at maskray dot me <=