[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug gas/25550] Review .arch directives
From: |
jbeulich at suse dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug gas/25550] Review .arch directives |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Feb 2020 12:36:12 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25550
--- Comment #16 from Jan Beulich <jbeulich at suse dot com> ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #14)
> (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #13)
> > Well, that's what is described by my 2nd option, but it is (as explained)
> > specifically not sufficient to merely exclude all uses of MMX registers to
> > achieve this.
>
> It is no difference from
>
> if (i.has_regmmx
> || i.tm.base_opcode == 0xf77 /* emms */
> || i.tm.base_opcode == 0xf0e /* femms */)
> x86_feature_2_used |= GNU_PROPERTY_X86_FEATURE_2_MMX;
It is, for the case where no MMX register is used, but MMX state still gets
engaged (like CVTPI2PS with a memory operand).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug gas/25550] Review .arch directives, (continued)
- [Bug gas/25550] Review .arch directives, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2020/02/14
- [Bug gas/25550] Review .arch directives, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2020/02/16
- [Bug gas/25550] Review .arch directives, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2020/02/16
- [Bug gas/25550] Review .arch directives, jbeulich at suse dot com, 2020/02/18
- [Bug gas/25550] Review .arch directives, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2020/02/18
- [Bug gas/25550] Review .arch directives, jbeulich at suse dot com, 2020/02/18
- [Bug gas/25550] Review .arch directives, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2020/02/18
- [Bug gas/25550] Review .arch directives, jbeulich at suse dot com, 2020/02/19
- [Bug gas/25550] Review .arch directives, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2020/02/19
- [Bug gas/25550] Review .arch directives, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2020/02/19
- [Bug gas/25550] Review .arch directives,
jbeulich at suse dot com <=
- [Bug gas/25550] Review .arch directives, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2020/02/19