[Bug gas/29524] x86: move-with-sign-extend inconsistent with move-with-zero-extend

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29524

--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot 
gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Beulich <jbeulich@sourceware.org>:

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=a28fedbc3f582ce7c8bad2eb017b1dc072bb1da7

commit a28fedbc3f582ce7c8bad2eb017b1dc072bb1da7
Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Date:   Mon Dec 12 14:01:02 2022 +0100

    x86: further re-work insn/suffix recognition to also cover MOVSX

    PR gas/29524

    Having templates with a suffix explicitly present has always been
    quirky. After prior adjustment all that's left to also eliminate the
    anomaly from move-with-sign-extend is to consolidate the insn templates
    and to make may_need_pass2() cope (plus extend testsuite coverage).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.