[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/30059] Weird interaction between "INSERT BEFORE" and "MEMORY"
From: |
stefan.tauner at gmx dot at |
Subject: |
[Bug ld/30059] Weird interaction between "INSERT BEFORE" and "MEMORY" |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Feb 2023 02:06:27 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30059
--- Comment #5 from Stefan <stefan.tauner at gmx dot at> ---
"inserted scripts are really intended only for statements that are inside
SECTIONS, and MEMORY is not one of those"
Maybe this is a problem with the nomenclature but aren't linker scripts that
get added on the command line without -T also "inserted scripts"? The
documentation does not indicate any such limitation for the non-T scripts but
rather that it simply amends the "main" linker script "Specifying a script in
this way merely augments the main linker script, with the extra commands placed
after the main script".
And the behavior w/o -T seems to be the same in regards of MEMORY so...
something is definitely not consistent here :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug ld/30059] New: Weird interaction between "INSERT BEFORE" and "MEMORY", stefan.tauner at gmx dot at, 2023/01/29
- [Bug ld/30059] Weird interaction between "INSERT BEFORE" and "MEMORY", stefan.tauner at gmx dot at, 2023/01/29
- [Bug ld/30059] Weird interaction between "INSERT BEFORE" and "MEMORY", stefan.tauner at gmx dot at, 2023/01/29
- [Bug ld/30059] Weird interaction between "INSERT BEFORE" and "MEMORY", stefan.tauner at gmx dot at, 2023/01/29
- [Bug ld/30059] Weird interaction between "INSERT BEFORE" and "MEMORY", amodra at gmail dot com, 2023/01/31
- [Bug ld/30059] Weird interaction between "INSERT BEFORE" and "MEMORY",
stefan.tauner at gmx dot at <=
- [Bug ld/30059] Weird interaction between "INSERT BEFORE" and "MEMORY", amodra at gmail dot com, 2023/01/31