[Bug ld/31134] New: 2.41: build fails with --enable-warn-execstack

[kloczko.tomasz at gmail dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31134

            Bug ID: 31134
           Summary: 2.41: build fails with --enable-warn-execstack
           Product: binutils
           Version: 2.41
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: ld
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: kloczko.tomasz at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

Looks like ld build fails when source tree is configured with
--enable-warn-execstack

make[4]: Entering directory '/home/tkloczko/rpmbuild/BUILD/binutils-2.41/ld'
/usr/bin/gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -I. -I. -I../bfd -I./../bfd -I./../include 
-O2 -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security
-Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS
-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong
-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -fno-omit-frame-pointer
-mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -m64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
-fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -fdata-sections -ffunction-sections   
 -DLOCALEDIR="\"/usr/share/locale\""  -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wshadow -Wstack-usage=262144 -DELF_LIST_OPTIONS=true
-DELF_SHLIB_LIST_OPTIONS=true -DELF_PLT_UNWIND_LIST_OPTIONS=true   -O2 -g
-grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security
-Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS
-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong
-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -fno-omit-frame-pointer
-mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -m64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
-fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -fdata-sections -ffunction-sections   
 -c -o eelf_x86_64.o eelf_x86_64.c
eelf_x86_64.c: In function ‘gldelf_x86_64_before_parse’:
eelf_x86_64.c:91:31: error: ‘DEFAULT_LD_ERROR_EXECSTACK’ undeclared (first use
in this function); did you mean ‘DEFAULT_LD_WARN_EXECSTACK’?
   91 |   link_info.error_execstack = DEFAULT_LD_ERROR_EXECSTACK;
      |                               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                               DEFAULT_LD_WARN_EXECSTACK
eelf_x86_64.c:91:31: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for
each function it appears in
eelf_x86_64.c:92:46: error: ‘DEFAULT_LD_ERROR_RWX_SEGMENTS’ undeclared (first
use in this function); did you mean ‘DEFAULT_LD_WARN_RWX_SEGMENTS’?
   92 |   link_info.warn_is_error_for_rwx_segments =
DEFAULT_LD_ERROR_RWX_SEGMENTS;
      |                                             
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                                             
DEFAULT_LD_WARN_RWX_SEGMENTS
make[4]: *** [Makefile:1599: eelf_x86_64.o] Error 1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.