[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/31605] New: [readelf, -wL] Highlight empty address range
From: |
vries at gcc dot gnu.org |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/31605] New: [readelf, -wL] Highlight empty address range |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Apr 2024 15:28:06 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31605
Bug ID: 31605
Summary: [readelf, -wL] Highlight empty address range
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Consider gdb test-case gdb.dwarf2/dw2-epilogue-begin.exp.
With readelf -wL <exec>, we have:
...
File name Line number Starting address View Stmt
dw2-epilogue-begin.c 44 0x4101e8 x
dw2-epilogue-begin.c 47 0x4101ec x
dw2-epilogue-begin.c - 0x4101ec
...
The entry for line 47 has an empty address range (and consequently gdb ignores
it), but it's not obvious from the readelf output.
I wonder if making this clear somehow using an annotation would be a good idea.
Say:
...
File name Line number Starting address View Stmt
dw2-epilogue-begin.c 44 0x4101e8 x
dw2-epilogue-begin.c 47 ~0x4101ec x
dw2-epilogue-begin.c - 0x4101ec
...
Or displaying the address in parentheses.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug binutils/31605] New: [readelf, -wL] Highlight empty address range,
vries at gcc dot gnu.org <=