|
From: | hjl.tools at gmail dot com |
Subject: | [Bug gas/32073] [2.44 Regression] gas failed to build x86-64 Linux kernel |
Date: | Mon, 12 Aug 2024 15:16:11 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073 --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #10) > (In reply to Michael Matz from comment #9) > > I fear the only non-contentious answer to all such questions is: "act in the > > same > > way as currently" :-/ I.e. try it out and emulate the behaviour. > > In which case it would also be impossible to fix anomalies there. In turn > meaning that hardly any bug in parsing of input can actually be fixed. Not a > good state to be in. How would you respond to a bug report in such an area > then? "We know it's broken, but it can't be fixed"? We should treat the longstanding usages as features. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |