[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/32211] New: 2.41 and later doesn't seem to honor the `-z`
From: |
danmcd at mnx dot io |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/32211] New: 2.41 and later doesn't seem to honor the `-z` flag |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Sep 2024 19:48:17 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32211
Bug ID: 32211
Summary: 2.41 and later doesn't seem to honor the `-z` flag
Product: binutils
Version: 2.41
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: danmcd at mnx dot io
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 15717
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15717&action=edit
Test data and script to confirm/deny that -z works.
I will attach a .tgz that has sample data, and a simple shell script to
confirm/deny that `objdump` will or will not produce output for an all-zeros
object.
Example run of this script is included here:
smartos-build-2023(~/objdump-debug-data)[1]% ./testscript.sh
GNU objdump (GNU Binutils) 2.41
Copyright (C) 2023 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of
the GNU General Public License version 3 or (at your option) any later version.
This program has absolutely no warranty.
Testing 21.4-libv8_base.a ... ***FAILED***
Testing 23.4-strap-libv8_base.a ... ***FAILED***
smartos-build-2023(~/objdump-debug-data)[0]% ./testscript.sh
~/smartos-live/proto.strap/usr/gnu/bin/gobjdump
GNU objdump (GNU Binutils) 2.34
Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of
the GNU General Public License version 3 or (at your option) any later version.
This program has absolutely no warranty.
Testing 21.4-libv8_base.a ... Passed
Testing 23.4-strap-libv8_base.a ... Passed
smartos-build-2023(~/objdump-debug-data)[0]%
This is on SmartOS (an illumos distribution), but I've tested pre-2.41 version
on Linux with passing, and I hope to have 2.42 on actual Linux results shortly.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug binutils/32211] New: 2.41 and later doesn't seem to honor the `-z` flag,
danmcd at mnx dot io <=
- [Bug binutils/32211] 2.41 and later doesn't seem to honor the `-z` flag, danmcd at mnx dot io, 2024/09/25
- [Bug binutils/32211] 2.41 and later don't seem to honor the `-z` flag, danmcd at mnx dot io, 2024/09/25
- [Bug binutils/32211] 2.41 and later don't seem to honor the `-z` flag, danmcd at mnx dot io, 2024/09/25
- [Bug binutils/32211] 2.41 and later don't seem to honor the `-z` flag, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2024/09/25
- [Bug binutils/32211] 2.41 and later don't seem to honor the `-z` flag, danmcd at mnx dot io, 2024/09/25
- [Bug binutils/32211] 2.41 and later don't seem to honor the `-z` flag, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2024/09/26
- [Bug binutils/32211] 2.41 and later don't seem to honor the `-z` flag, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2024/09/26
- [Bug binutils/32211] 2.41 and later don't seem to honor the `-z` flag, danmcd at mnx dot io, 2024/09/26
- [Bug binutils/32211] 2.41 and later don't seem to honor the `-z` flag, nickc at redhat dot com, 2024/09/26
- [Bug binutils/32211] 2.41 and later don't seem to honor the `-z` flag, danmcd at mnx dot io, 2024/09/26