[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/32211] 2.41 and later don't seem to honor the `-z` flag
From: |
nickc at redhat dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/32211] 2.41 and later don't seem to honor the `-z` flag |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Sep 2024 08:38:20 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32211
Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
--- Comment #16 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> ---
Hi Dan,
(In reply to Dan McDonald from comment #15)
> 1.) Thank you for confirming there was a doc update and I should've RTFM
> more carefully. There's a philosophical argument about surprising chnages,
> but given the next item I'm not going to raise a stink.
Thanks. I am sorry that this change caused you so much hassle. At the time it
seemed rather obvious - bss sections do not contain anything (on disk) so
disassembling them could not produce any useful information. In hindsight of
course this assumption was wrong.
> 2.) My use of the `-fno-zero-initialized-in-bss` compiler/gcc flag cured
> what ailed me.
Hooray.
I was wondering however - exactly what is it that your testsuite is checking
for ?
Maybe there is way to conduct the test without relying on objdump to
disassemble .bss sections...
> This was educational. Thank you for your time & patience.
And thank you for taking the time to report this problem and then persist in
helping me to understand the real issue.
Cheers
Nick
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug binutils/32211] 2.41 and later don't seem to honor the `-z` flag, (continued)
- [Bug binutils/32211] 2.41 and later don't seem to honor the `-z` flag, danmcd at mnx dot io, 2024/09/26
- [Bug binutils/32211] 2.41 and later don't seem to honor the `-z` flag, nickc at redhat dot com, 2024/09/26
- [Bug binutils/32211] 2.41 and later don't seem to honor the `-z` flag, danmcd at mnx dot io, 2024/09/26
- [Bug binutils/32211] 2.41 and later don't seem to honor the `-z` flag, danmcd at mnx dot io, 2024/09/26
- [Bug binutils/32211] 2.41 and later don't seem to honor the `-z` flag, danmcd at mnx dot io, 2024/09/26
- [Bug binutils/32211] 2.41 and later don't seem to honor the `-z` flag, danmcd at mnx dot io, 2024/09/26
- [Bug binutils/32211] 2.41 and later don't seem to honor the `-z` flag, nickc at redhat dot com, 2024/09/26
- [Bug binutils/32211] 2.41 and later don't seem to honor the `-z` flag, danmcd at mnx dot io, 2024/09/26
- [Bug binutils/32211] 2.41 and later don't seem to honor the `-z` flag, nickc at redhat dot com, 2024/09/26
- [Bug binutils/32211] 2.41 and later don't seem to honor the `-z` flag, danmcd at mnx dot io, 2024/09/26
- [Bug binutils/32211] 2.41 and later don't seem to honor the `-z` flag,
nickc at redhat dot com <=
- [Bug binutils/32211] 2.41 and later don't seem to honor the `-z` flag, danmcd at mnx dot io, 2024/09/27