[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bison 1.30f
From: |
Hans Aberg |
Subject: |
Re: Bison 1.30f |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Dec 2001 00:17:03 +0100 |
At 13:04 -0800 2001/12/10, Paul Eggert wrote:
>In what way is Bison not outputting valid C++ now?
>
>Of course Bison could do a better job of outputting C++, but isn't the
>code valid (albeit ugly) C++ code now?
Yes, it is C++ correct, except for what might be inconvenience with the
namespaces, adding "using", when one does not want to.
Hans Aberg
- Re: Bison & C++, (continued)
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Mike Castle, 2001/12/12
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Akim Demaille, 2001/12/13
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Paul Eggert, 2001/12/10
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Hans Aberg, 2001/12/11
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Hans Aberg, 2001/12/11
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Paul Eggert, 2001/12/12
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Hans Aberg, 2001/12/12
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Paul Eggert, 2001/12/12
- Re: Bison 1.30f,
Hans Aberg <=
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Akim Demaille, 2001/12/12
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Akim Demaille, 2001/12/12
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Hans Aberg, 2001/12/12
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Paul Eggert, 2001/12/12
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Hans Aberg, 2001/12/12
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Paul Eggert, 2001/12/12
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Hans Aberg, 2001/12/13
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Akim Demaille, 2001/12/13
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Hans Aberg, 2001/12/13
- Re: Bison 1.30f, Paul Eggert, 2001/12/13