[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LR(1) error recovery in LALR(1)
From: |
Hans Aberg |
Subject: |
Re: LR(1) error recovery in LALR(1) |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Mar 2005 23:47:52 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.0.6 |
At 11:11 -0800 2005/03/02, Tzvetan Mikov wrote:
>Hans Aberg wrote:
>> As for the other question, I have come, at least initially, to the same
>> conclusion as you, that LR(1) without table compression is probably fully
>> acceptable on todays computers.
>
>Once I had to do the unthinkable - I ran a Bison generated parser - with
>some hand tweaking - in a 8051 (in retrospect recursive descent would
>have been better, but wouldn't have brought the same sense of
>accomplishment :-) ). So, whatever is decided, please don't abandon the
>good old LRAR(1) ...
LALR cannot be abandoned, as it is required (I feel sure) by Bison's POSIX
Yacc compatibility requirement.
Hans Aberg