[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: %destructor feedback
From: |
SteveBravy |
Subject: |
Re: %destructor feedback |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:19:51 EST |
In a message dated 12/21/2005 3:11:10 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
address@hidden writes:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, Akim Demaille wrote:
> >>> "Paul" == Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >> - we desire that in all the skeletons no $n is ever freed from an
> >> "active" rule, even if we leave it using YYACCEPT, YYERROR, or
> >> YYABORT.
>
> > Yes, that sounds right.
>
> Well, AFAICS that's already the behavior in glr.c, isn't it?
> Otherwise I missed the bit of code that is wrong.
As I recall, it was just YYABORT and YYACCEPT in yacc.c that was a
problem. When I looked at the time, glr.c seemed fine.
Joel
_______________________________________________
address@hidden http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison
Hello Folks:
I'd like to get off this E-mail list but don't know how to do so. Can any of
you give me a hand?
cheers
- Re: %destructor feedback, (continued)
- Re: %destructor feedback, Akim Demaille, 2005/12/22
- Re: %destructor feedback, Joel E. Denny, 2005/12/22
- Re: %destructor feedback, Akim Demaille, 2005/12/23
- Re: %destructor feedback, Akim Demaille, 2005/12/27
- Re: %destructor feedback, Akim Demaille, 2005/12/27
- Re: %destructor feedback, Frank Heckenbach, 2005/12/29
Re: %destructor feedback,
SteveBravy <=