[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNU Bison 2.5] testsuite: 229 232 failed
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: [GNU Bison 2.5] testsuite: 229 232 failed |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 16:12:52 +0100 |
Le 23 mars 2012 à 10:38, gccbison a écrit :
> On 2012-03-22 07:57, Akim Demaille wrote:
>> 119: synclines.at:110 Prologue synch line
>> Could you please send one of the corresponding logs? Say
>> testsuite.dir/119/test-suite.log.
> /tests/testsuite -v -d -x -C tests CC=g++
> oke?
Thanks Tys, now I have a better understanding of
what is going on: G++ with -pedantic thinks that
line numbers higher than 32768 will overflow!!!
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2007-03/msg00116.html
We don't have the problem when running the C compiler
because we do specify a reasonable -std (I have -std=gnu99).
So I need to make the same for C++, which is certainly
something that requires care. I'll address this later.
Meanwhile, could you please see if the following patches
(installed in the "next" branch) address at least the
warning options mismatch? Thanks in advance.
0001-tests-fix-dependencies.patch
Description: Binary data
0002-tests-when-using-the-C-compiler-use-its-flags-too.patch
Description: Binary data
- [GNU Bison 2.5] testsuite: 229 232 failed, gccbison, 2012/03/13
- Re: [GNU Bison 2.5] testsuite: 229 232 failed, Akim Demaille, 2012/03/20
- Re: [GNU Bison 2.5] testsuite: 229 232 failed, gccbison, 2012/03/20
- Re: [GNU Bison 2.5] testsuite: 229 232 failed, Akim Demaille, 2012/03/22
- Re: [GNU Bison 2.5] testsuite: 229 232 failed, gccbison, 2012/03/23
- Re: [GNU Bison 2.5] testsuite: 229 232 failed,
Akim Demaille <=
- Re: [GNU Bison 2.5] testsuite: 229 232 failed, gccbison, 2012/03/23
- Re: [GNU Bison 2.5] testsuite: 229 232 failed, Akim Demaille, 2012/03/23
- Re: [GNU Bison 2.5] testsuite: 229 232 failed, Akim Demaille, 2012/03/24
- Re: [GNU Bison 2.5] testsuite: 229 232 failed, Akim Demaille, 2012/03/24