Re: What is going on this list? There are a lot of sudden bug reports :)

[David Sugar]

Yes, I discovered that they did, and that was a much cleaner result :).  
I think the atomic issue is critically important on some compile targets, 
and of course debian is targetted architecturally everywhere :)..

On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Federico Montesino Pouzols wrote:

> 
>       Hi,
> 
>       From what I read in some of the later posts to this list, I
> guess that the flood of old bug reports and comments that have
> appeared consists of posts that were blocked by mailman because the
> authors are not subscribed to the list. Are we still receiving so much
> SPAM as some months ago? I believed the Savannah hackers had
> incorporated SPAM filters to the GNU mail machines.
> 
>       Apart from other fixes that were pending before this flood, we
> now have some more fixes to do. Among them, there is a serious bug
> report from Mark Purcell regarding the use of asm/atomic.h. I think
> this is of high priority and I will incorporate this patch if there is
> no problem with removing the use of asm/atomic.h and the
> HAVE_ASM_ATOMIC... defines.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-commoncpp mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-commoncpp
>