[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Test framework; new counter class
From: |
Federico Montesino Pouzols |
Subject: |
Re: Test framework; new counter class |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:10:22 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 01:04:56AM +0200, Albert Strasheim wrote:
>
> I'm confused.
>
> We should be using sys/atomic.h instead of asm/atomic.h, because
> asm/atomic.h is an evil kernel header. Yet I haven't been able to find
> an i386 Linux system on which sys/atomic.h actually exists (checked
> Debian unstable, RedHat 7.1, and recent Mandrake).
>
> Where is it? How do I get at the atomic stuff on i386 without violating
> this policy?
>
I haven't find any sys/atomic.h too :) I guess it does not
exist.
> Cheers,
>
> Albert
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-commoncpp mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-commoncpp
- Re: Test framework; and what should be in 1.1.0, (continued)
- Re: Test framework; and what should be in 1.1.0, David Sugar, 2003/01/03
- RE: Test framework; and what should be in 1.1.0, Chad Yates, 2003/01/03
- Re: Test framework; and what should be in 1.1.0, Albert Strasheim, 2003/01/03
- Re: Test framework; and what should be in 1.1.0, Federico Montesino Pouzols, 2003/01/17
- RE: Test framework, Chad Yates, 2003/01/03
- Re: Test framework, Federico Montesino Pouzols, 2003/01/17
- RE: Test framework, Chad Yates, 2003/01/17
- Re: Test framework, Federico Montesino Pouzols, 2003/01/18
Re: Test framework; new counter class,
Federico Montesino Pouzols <=