[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: coreutils-5.1.3 released: bug-fix-only, candidate for stable 5.2.0
From: |
Michael Elizabeth Chastain |
Subject: |
Re: coreutils-5.1.3 released: bug-fix-only, candidate for stable 5.2.0 |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 06:14:28 -0500 (EST) |
mec> rm -f
/house/chastain/coreutils/coreutils-5.1.3/tests/wc/Makefile.am
/house/chastain/coreutils/coreutils-5.1.3/tests/wc/Makefile.amt
mec> sed -n '1,/^##test-files-begin/p' >
/house/chastain/coreutils/coreutils-5.1.3/tests/wc/Makefile.amt
mec>
mec> This is a bug in tests/wc/Makefile.in. $< is defined only for
mec> inference rules and .DEFAULT, not for explicit rules. See:
jim> Many of the coreutils Makefiles use that construct, and it's
jim> ok as long as their rules rarely need to be run.
jim> Maybe you accidentally modified tests/Makefile.am.in, wc/Test.pm,
jim> or another dependent? Otherwise, that rule shouldn't trigger.
No, I am running out of a pristine source directory unpacked straight
from the tarball, with nothing else done to it first. I don't
re-use the source dir from one configuration to another -- every run
starts with a fresh 'tar xjf ...'.
That use of $< in tests/wc/Makefile.am does not conform to Single Unix
Specification v3. How about just doing this and conforming:
sed -n '1,/^##test-files-begin/p' $(srcdir)/../Makefile.am.in > address@hidden
> The coreutils INSTALL file says that you need a version of `make' that
> supports the `VPATH' variable if you do non-srcdir builds. I suspect
> that applies in this case.
You are right. Okay, I will stick to srcdir builds when I use hpux make
and osf make.
Anyways, if you want to put up another tarball, I'll be happy to churn
it again.
Michael C