[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: chown xxx.yyy, POSIX, and LSB
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: chown xxx.yyy, POSIX, and LSB |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 20:21:10 +0100 |
>> So I guess it'd be more like POSIXLY_INCORRECT :)
>
> Just to be clear about what I mean, here is the patch I intend to
> apply for the Fedora Core coreutils package:
>
> --- coreutils-5.2.0/lib/userspec.c.allow_old_options 2004-02-23
> 16:51:00.000000000 +0000
> +++ coreutils-5.2.0/lib/userspec.c 2004-02-23 17:04:41.000000000 +0000
> @@ -171,7 +171,8 @@
> separator = strchr (spec, ':');
>
> /* If there is no colon, then see if there's a `.'. */
> - if (separator == NULL && posix2_version () < 200112)
> + if (separator == NULL && (posix2_version () < 200112 ||
> + !getenv ("POSIXLY_CORRECT")))
Please consider using a different environment variable.
Setting POSIXLY_CORRECT should not make an otherwise-POSIX-conforming
program like GNU chown *non*conforming.
- chown xxx.yyy, POSIX, and LSB, Tim Waugh, 2004/02/23
- Re: chown xxx.yyy, POSIX, and LSB, Jim Meyering, 2004/02/23
- Re: chown xxx.yyy, POSIX, and LSB, Tim Waugh, 2004/02/23
- Re: chown xxx.yyy, POSIX, and LSB,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: chown xxx.yyy, POSIX, and LSB, Paul Jarc, 2004/02/23
- Re: chown xxx.yyy, POSIX, and LSB, Tim Waugh, 2004/02/23
- Re: chown xxx.yyy, POSIX, and LSB, Jim Meyering, 2004/02/23
- Re: chown xxx.yyy, POSIX, and LSB, Paul Eggert, 2004/02/23