[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bugs in unexpand(1) version 6.10
From: |
Mike Frysinger |
Subject: |
Re: Bugs in unexpand(1) version 6.10 |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:03:18 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.11.0 (Linux/2.6.28; KDE/4.2.0; x86_64; ; ) |
On Friday 23 January 2009 09:35:54 Pádraig Brady wrote:
> What distribution are you using (I'm guessing Fedora 10).
> Distributions that patch coreutils really should
> modify the version string accordingly.
if coreutils wants distros to do that, it should really facilitate things.
the way gcc does it now with gcc-4.3+ is a pretty good standard:
./configure ... --with-pkgversion="some vendor/distro string" ...
i would certainly start using that in Gentoo
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Re: Bugs in unexpand(1) version 6.10,
Mike Frysinger <=
- Re: Bugs in unexpand(1) version 6.10, Jim Meyering, 2009/02/03
- Re: Bugs in unexpand(1) version 6.10, Mike Frysinger, 2009/02/05
- Re: Bugs in unexpand(1) version 6.10, Jim Meyering, 2009/02/06
- Re: Bugs in unexpand(1) version 6.10, Mike Frysinger, 2009/02/09
- Re: Bugs in unexpand(1) version 6.10, Jim Meyering, 2009/02/10
- Re: Bugs in unexpand(1) version 6.10, Mike Frysinger, 2009/02/10
- Re: Bugs in unexpand(1) version 6.10, Jim Meyering, 2009/02/11