[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bugs in unexpand(1) version 6.10
From: |
Mike Frysinger |
Subject: |
Re: Bugs in unexpand(1) version 6.10 |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 18:09:02 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.11.0 (Linux/2.6.28; KDE/4.2.0; x86_64; ; ) |
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 03:28:58 Jim Meyering wrote:
> Mike Frysinger <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Friday 23 January 2009 09:35:54 Pádraig Brady wrote:
> >> What distribution are you using (I'm guessing Fedora 10).
> >> Distributions that patch coreutils really should
> >> modify the version string accordingly.
> >
> > if coreutils wants distros to do that, it should really facilitate
> > things. the way gcc does it now with gcc-4.3+ is a pretty good standard:
> > ./configure ... --with-pkgversion="some vendor/distro string" ...
>
> Good idea.
> Patches welcome.
do you want the gcc method or a new method ?
gcc does:
- running `gcc --version` outputs:
gcc (GCC) 4.3.3
- running `configure --with-pkgversion=PKG` changes it to:
gcc (PKG) 4.3.3
so the coreutils analog would be:
- running `ls --version` outputs:
ls (GNU coreutils) 6.12
- running `configure --with-pkgversion=PKG` changes it to:
ls (PKG) 6.12
that way we could end up with:
ls (Gentoo p1.0) 6.12
-mike
- Re: Bugs in unexpand(1) version 6.10, Mike Frysinger, 2009/02/02
- Re: Bugs in unexpand(1) version 6.10, Jim Meyering, 2009/02/03
- Re: Bugs in unexpand(1) version 6.10,
Mike Frysinger <=
- Re: Bugs in unexpand(1) version 6.10, Jim Meyering, 2009/02/06
- Re: Bugs in unexpand(1) version 6.10, Mike Frysinger, 2009/02/09
- Re: Bugs in unexpand(1) version 6.10, Jim Meyering, 2009/02/10
- Re: Bugs in unexpand(1) version 6.10, Mike Frysinger, 2009/02/10
- Re: Bugs in unexpand(1) version 6.10, Jim Meyering, 2009/02/11
- Re: Bugs in unexpand(1) version 6.10, Mike Frysinger, 2009/02/11
- Re: Bugs in unexpand(1) version 6.10, Karl Berry, 2009/02/11