[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug with ls
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: bug with ls |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:17:39 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081209 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
[please keep the list in the loop; and on this list, it is customary to
not top-post]
According to jason on 2/11/2009 8:14 PM:
>> Meanwhile, any patch to the documentation to make it
>> more obvious that -R is a no-op in the presence of -d is both simpler to
>> write and also more likely to be applied immediately.
> Understood, a good explanation. I don't know of other distros/un*x
> implementations that behave this way, mostly because I work with Linux
> almost exclusively these days. I agree updating or clarifying the man
> page condition would be best.
Do you have any suggested wording which would have helped your situation?
- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!
Eric Blake address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkmTlNMACgkQ84KuGfSFAYALPACfWJAQhkpjGkxgbCnr9svt5wUO
UDoAn0wCMoKPODWMrl2SlqAjJgikTO++
=5RlI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- bug with ls, Jason Temple, 2009/02/10
- Re: bug with ls, Eric Blake, 2009/02/10
- Message not available
- Re: bug with ls,
Eric Blake <=