[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mkdir owner:group option
From: |
Mike Frysinger |
Subject: |
Re: mkdir owner:group option |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Mar 2009 06:16:37 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.11.1 (Linux/2.6.28; KDE/4.2.1; x86_64; ; ) |
On Tuesday 10 March 2009 06:11:47 Jim Meyering wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > mkudir() { (u=$1; g=$2; shift 2; install -d -o"$u" -g"$g" "$@"); }
>
> Good idea.
> I prefer to use "local", and thus to avoid forking a subshell.
in general, i agree. however, some people like to omit "local" support from
their shell (since it isnt in POSIX), or do really stupid s**t like requiring
quoting on the RHS (dash comes to mind).
but if you're using a sane shell, then neither of these should be an issue,
and the proposed version is good stuff:
> Also, you can drop the semicolon between the assignments:
>
> mkudir() { local u=$1 g=$2; shift 2; install -d -o"$u" -g"$g" "$@"; }
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: mkdir owner:group option, Jim Meyering, 2009/03/10