Re: Irix nit

[Jim Meyering]

Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> ...lots of these, probably a missing/broken option check? (I'm curious
> why it wants to use a GNU option with the Irix (non-GNU) ld...)
>
> cc -c99   -g  -Wl,--as-needed -o whoami whoami.o libver.a
> ../lib/libcoreutils.a  ../lib/libcoreutils.a
>
> (null): WARNING 1  : Unknown option: -as-needed (ignored).
>
>
> ld32: WARNING 84 : ../lib/libcoreutils.a is not used for resolving any
> symbol.
>
>
> Doesn't seem to be a big problem, since 7.1.49 built okay and the
> tests aren't failing spectacularly.
>
> What would be most useful, config.log?

If it doesn't cause any failure, it's not worth investigating or
changing, since Irix is on the fringe.