Re: Irix nit

[Matthew Woehlke]

Jim Meyering wrote:
> Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> > ...lots of these, probably a missing/broken option check? (I'm curious
> > why it wants to use a GNU option with the Irix (non-GNU) ld...)
>
> If it doesn't cause any failure, it's not worth investigating or
> changing, since Irix is on the fringe.

Fair enough (as long as it's specific to this platform and doesn't start 
breaking things elsewhere :-) ).

(OT: Can you please refrain from CC'ing me on mail to bug-coreutils or 
bug-gnulib? I follow both via gmane and sending me a copy by private 
mail isn't useful. Thanks.)

--
Matthew
Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.
--
"Two IIRC's must make a right" -- Larry Hall (paraphrased)