[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Core-utils 7.2; building only 'su'
From: |
Bob Friesenhahn |
Subject: |
Re: Core-utils 7.2; building only 'su' |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:16:32 -0500 (CDT) |
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Douglas Held wrote:
Well, you would just change autoconf so that it fails fast when its
configuration is not "well formed"...
How would autoconf know that?
Currently we have 'make distcheck' which tests a distribution tarball
and entrusts that the maintainer won't distribute that tarball if the
test fails.
Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
- Re: Core-utils 7.2; building only 'su', (continued)
- Re: Core-utils 7.2; building only 'su', Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/04/15
- Re: Core-utils 7.2; building only 'su', Eric Blake, 2009/04/15
- Re: Core-utils 7.2; building only 'su', Bob Friesenhahn, 2009/04/15
- Re: Core-utils 7.2; building only 'su', Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/04/15
- Re: Core-utils 7.2; building only 'su', Bob Friesenhahn, 2009/04/15
- Re: Core-utils 7.2; building only 'su', Douglas Held, 2009/04/15
- Re: Core-utils 7.2; building only 'su',
Bob Friesenhahn <=
- Re: Core-utils 7.2; building only 'su', Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/04/15
- Re: Core-utils 7.2; building only 'su', Keith Marshall, 2009/04/15
- Re: Core-utils 7.2; building only 'su', Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/04/15
Re: Core-utils 7.2; building only 'su', Douglas Held, 2009/04/13