[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Official sources vs. RCVS
From: |
Derek R. Price |
Subject: |
Re: Official sources vs. RCVS |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:51:15 -0500 |
Karl Fogel wrote:
> I haven't looked at the patch, but it seems that the most important
> part will be the documentation -- guiding people as to how to use
> these features. I hope it's thorough. :-)
Short of examples, it could probably use an attachment to the "Branching
and Merging" section, and I had to change a few sets of quotes to @samp
& @code, but other than that it looks pretty good.
Are there notes anywhere on the various texinfo constructs cvs.texinfo
uses?
Derek
--
Derek Price CVS Solutions Architect ( http://CVSHome.org )
mailto:dprice@openavenue.com OpenAvenue ( http://OpenAvenue.com )
--
I will not bring sheep to class.
I will not bring sheep to class.
I will not bring sheep to class...
- Bart Simpson on chalkboard, _The Simpsons_
- RE: Official sources vs. RCVS, Cameron, Steve, 2001/01/29
- Re: Official sources vs. RCVS, Stephen Rasku, 2001/01/30
- RE: Official sources vs. RCVS, Cameron, Steve, 2001/01/30
- RE: Official sources vs. RCVS, Cameron, Steve, 2001/01/30
- RE: Official sources vs. RCVS, Cameron, Steve, 2001/01/30
- RE: Official sources vs. RCVS, J. Cone, 2001/01/31
- RE: Official sources vs. RCVS, Cameron, Steve, 2001/01/31
- RE: Official sources vs. RCVS, Cameron, Steve, 2001/01/31