[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More on 1.11.2 corruption problem
From: |
Mike Quinn |
Subject: |
Re: More on 1.11.2 corruption problem |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Sep 2002 12:04:32 -0700 |
OK, more update - apparently our CVS database has been corrupted for a while.
The script that was sent to me verifies that. So 1.11.2 adding a branch
seems to put it over the edge, whereas 1.11 doesn't (why, I don't know).
So it's possible there's nothing wrong with 1.11.2.
I'll do some more experiments and report back later on.
-Mike
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 9/19/2002 at 11:36 AM lawrence.jones@eds.com wrote:
>Mike Quinn writes:
>>
>> I ran my own script and checked out 100 different branches and it worked
>fine before
>> adding the branch, and breaks big-time afterwards.
>
>It certainly sounds like your CVS 1.11.2 is broken -- did you build it
>yourself or did you get an executable from somewhere? Obviously, such a
>serious error would have been reported long ago if it affected CVS in
>general. Are you sure you can cause the corruption with a local
>repository? Most corruption is caused by NFS bugs. Have you run the
>sanity checks (make check) to validate your CVS executable?
>
>-Larry Jones
>
>I stand FIRM in my belief of what's right! I REFUSE to
>compromise my principles! -- Calvin
- More on 1.11.2 corruption problem, Mike Quinn, 2002/09/19
- Re: More on 1.11.2 corruption problem, Larry Jones, 2002/09/19
- Re: More on 1.11.2 corruption problem, Mike Quinn, 2002/09/19
- Re: More on 1.11.2 corruption problem, Larry Jones, 2002/09/19
- Re: More on 1.11.2 corruption problem, Mike Quinn, 2002/09/19
- Re: More on 1.11.2 corruption problem,
Mike Quinn <=
- Re: More on 1.11.2 corruption problem, Donald Sharp, 2002/09/19
- Re: More on 1.11.2 corruption problem, Axel Bodemer, 2002/09/20
- Re: More on 1.11.2 corruption problem, Larry Jones, 2002/09/23