[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH] Is BeOS really worth the trouble?
From: |
Alexey Mahotkin |
Subject: |
[PATCH] Is BeOS really worth the trouble? |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Jun 2003 00:43:28 +0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp, i386-debian-linux) |
Sure, I was fascinated by that statement every time I looked at client.c
(that was often).
I do not even know who JT is?
src/ChangeLog | 2 ++
src/client.c | 2 --
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- ccvs/src/client.c~silly-comment Wed Jun 18 00:35:49 2003
+++ ccvs-alexm/src/client.c Wed Jun 18 00:35:54 2003
@@ -1,5 +1,3 @@
-/* JT thinks BeOS is worth the trouble. */
-
/* CVS client-related stuff.
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
--- ccvs/src/ChangeLog~silly-comment Wed Jun 18 00:35:51 2003
+++ ccvs-alexm/src/ChangeLog Wed Jun 18 00:36:35 2003
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
2003-06-18 Alexey Mahotkin <alexm@hsys.msk.ru>
+ * client.c: Remove silly comment.
+
* client.c, client.h, main.c, root.c, server.c, server.h,
socket-client.c, socket-client.h: Rename HAVE_KERBEROS to
HAVE_KERBEROS4.
_
--alexm
- [PATCH] Is BeOS really worth the trouble?,
Alexey Mahotkin <=