[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suppressing log suppression (down with the -l switch)
From: |
Matt Doar |
Subject: |
Re: Suppressing log suppression (down with the -l switch) |
Date: |
20 Jun 2003 10:57:26 -0700 |
Turns out that contrib/check_cvs is still using the -l option. Should be
fine to remove it.
# -l - Do not log this command in the history file. I am
# doing this because we will literaly be looking at
# thousands of files with *lots* of revisions.
~Matt
Matt Doar, matt@trpz.com
On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 18:26, Duncan Howard wrote:
> Yes, back-porting is a good idea. If the -l switch is useless and/or a
> liability, existing CVS users will benefit from the removal of the problem.
>
> Regards,
>
> -duncan
>
>
> At 11:49 AM 5/29/2003, Derek Robert Price wrote:
> >Larry Jones wrote:
> >
> >>Derek Robert Price writes:
> >>
> >>
> >>>I guess I'm just looking at this as pretty much useless, or unused
> >>>anyhow, by the majority and anethema to people like our bug reporter and
> >>>why not remove it?
> >>>
> >>
> >>I was just reporting why it's there, I agree with your analysis and
> >>conclusion.
> >>
> >
> >Done. Any opinions on whether I should back-port that to 1.11.x? I think
> >I could look at this as a security fix and I don't think the change was
> >invasive enough to affect stability, but I'm not too worried about it.
> >
> >Derek
> >
> >--
> > *8^)
> >
> >Email: derek@ximbiot.com
> >
> >Get CVS support at <http://ximbiot.com>!
> >--
> >"The hypothalamus is one of the most important parts of the brain,
> >involved in many kinds of motivation, among other functions. The
> >hypothalamus controls the "Four F's": 1. fighting; 2. fleeing; 3.feeding;
> >and 4. mating."
> >
> > -- Psychology professor in neuropsychology intro course
> >
> >
> >
>
> Duncan Howard
> Helix Community Program Manager
> http://helixcommunity.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-cvs mailing list
> Bug-cvs@gnu.org
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs
- Re: Suppressing log suppression (down with the -l switch),
Matt Doar <=