[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch
From: |
Derek Robert Price |
Subject: |
Re: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch |
Date: |
Wed, 12 May 2004 17:01:33 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040413 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Conrad T. Pino wrote:
>Hi Derek,
>
>>From: Derek Robert Price
>>
>>Hopefully. Occassionally, when Windows is involved, they say
>>something along the lines of "do it yourself", but mostly they try to
>>support it. We'll probably get the nanosleep since it really just
>>requires <winsock.h> or, alternatively, a declaration of select() &
>>timeval in nanosleep.c.
>
>
>Looks like we have a solution for "nanosleep".
>
>How do you want divide the work?
Feel free to submit a patch! :)
>>If we get the gettime, I suspect it will involve more standards (C89,
>>C99, POSIX, etc.) than your suggestion. If you'd like to research
>>whether Windows made any concessions in that department to any of the
>>various standards, you might be able to speed things up. Keeping in
>>mind, of course, that the GNULIB folks know quite a bit more about
>>standards and portability than I and still often take off in
>>directions I didn't expect. :)
>
>
>Jim Hyslop is the only other respondent to the "gettime" inquiry. Is
>Jim on the CVS Project, GNULib Project or both?
>
>Any interest in a temporary hack until a better solution appears?
I'm not quite ready to give up hope that someone will pipe up with a
better solution yet. Let's wait a bit before we give up hope.
Derek
- --
*8^)
Email: derek@ximbiot.com
Get CVS support at <http://ximbiot.com>!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFAopCsLD1OTBfyMaQRArthAJ94XaVZLG/kpmJL1jld4s5fhLzWxwCggVIb
GFOcX/2kpmak19ixp5pX7Mw=
=M5Q2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch, Conrad T. Pino, 2004/05/10
- RE: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch, Conrad T. Pino, 2004/05/10
- Re: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch, Derek Robert Price, 2004/05/11
- RE: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch, Conrad T. Pino, 2004/05/11
- Re: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch, Derek Robert Price, 2004/05/11
- RE: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch, Conrad T. Pino, 2004/05/12
- Re: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch, Derek Robert Price, 2004/05/12
- RE: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch, Conrad T. Pino, 2004/05/12
- Re: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch,
Derek Robert Price <=
- RE: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch, Conrad T. Pino, 2004/05/12
- Re: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch, Derek Robert Price, 2004/05/13
- RE: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch, Conrad T. Pino, 2004/05/13
- RE: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch, Conrad T. Pino, 2004/05/14
- Re: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch, Derek Robert Price, 2004/05/14
- RE: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch, Conrad T. Pino, 2004/05/14
- RE: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch, Conrad T. Pino, 2004/05/13
- nanosleep.c & winsock.h (was Re: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch), Derek Robert Price, 2004/05/13
- RE: nanosleep.c & winsock.h (was Re: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch), Conrad T. Pino, 2004/05/13
- Re: nanosleep.c & winsock.h (was Re: Windows Build Broken - Feature Branch), Derek Robert Price, 2004/05/13