[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: $Log$ substitution in binary files.
|
From: |
Derek Robert Price |
|
Subject: |
Re: $Log$ substitution in binary files. |
|
Date: |
Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:49:35 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Mark D. Baushke wrote:
> Derek Robert Price <derek@ximbiot.com> writes:
>
> >Okay, but how much would you deem acceptable for 1.11.x?
>
>
> Hmmm... 8 to 16 Kbytes (RCS_BUFSIZE or MAX_BUF_SIZE) seems unlikely to
> cause a regression with most current users.
Are you proprosing an 8-16k limit on the expansion of any keyword or
an 8-16k limit on the comment leader?
I have to admit, now that you remind me, I am reluctant to set any new
limit on stable with so few reports out there. Even a 256 byte limit
on the comment leader seems unlikely to break anybody's setup, but
users never cease to suprise me...
Cheers,
Derek
- --
*8^)
Email: derek@ximbiot.com
Get CVS support at <http://ximbiot.com>!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBQdsfLD1OTBfyMaQRAoRfAJ42OJE+pFlUH7ka8auUhh9w+4HwTACgqMYZ
AESqUQDFKcRhsPtOYeAsPy0=
=3Llu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----