[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cvs co understands CVSROOT not understood by cvs up
From: |
Mark D. Baushke |
Subject: |
Re: cvs co understands CVSROOT not understood by cvs up |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:32:37 -0700 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Derek Robert Price <derek@ximbiot.com> writes:
> Alexander Taler wrote:
>
> > Mark> I believe that 'localhost/tmp/mdb.testit should either not be
> > legal, or Mark> should have the CVS/Root be the changed to be the
> > canonical form of it.
> >
> > Derek> Personally, in a case like this, I would favor the logical
> > minimum Derek> (host/path), since it does not actually exclude the
> > nominally more Derek> human readable form containing colons or
> > other "odd" symbols.
> >
> > From your responses I deduce an agreement that CVS should support
> > the degenerate localhost/var/cvs form of the CVSROOT. Following is
> > a sanity.sh patch to 1.11 to exercise this case.
>
>
> Looking at this now. Incidentally, if I didn't mention it before,
> Mark. I don't have a problem with storing the canonical root in CVS/Root.
Storing the canonical CVS/Root would be my suggested fix for the problem
in the long term... including a FQDN for the hostname...
-- Mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFBUeFl3x41pRYZE/gRAlFBAJ4+d3OV9i0yS88nmmPXkQymc5ixnQCdH28Z
RDMY8YGE9D4iiZhjcxbIF40=
=PnNO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- cvs co understands CVSROOT not understood by cvs up, Alexander Taler, 2004/09/07
- Re: cvs co understands CVSROOT not understood by cvs up, Mark D. Baushke, 2004/09/07
- Re: cvs co understands CVSROOT not understood by cvs up, Derek Robert Price, 2004/09/08
- Re: cvs co understands CVSROOT not understood by cvs up, Alexander Taler, 2004/09/21
- Re: cvs co understands CVSROOT not understood by cvs up, Derek Robert Price, 2004/09/22
- Re: cvs co understands CVSROOT not understood by cvs up,
Mark D. Baushke <=
- Re: cvs co understands CVSROOT not understood by cvs up, Derek Robert Price, 2004/09/24
- Re: cvs co understands CVSROOT not understood by cvs up, Larry Jones, 2004/09/24
- Re: cvs co understands CVSROOT not understood by cvs up, Derek Robert Price, 2004/09/24