[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug #27945] control over including libelf
From: |
Alex Schuster |
Subject: |
[bug #27945] control over including libelf |
Date: |
Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:01:19 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/4.3; Linux) KHTML/4.3.2 (like Gecko) |
URL:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?27945>
Summary: control over including libelf
Project: DDD
Submitted by: wonkothesane
Submitted on: Do 05 Nov 2009 12:01:17 GMT
Category: Build
Severity: 3 - Normal
Item Group: None
Status: None
Privacy: Public
Assigned to: None
Open/Closed: Open
Discussion Lock: Any
Release: 3.3.12-rc1
_______________________________________________________
Details:
Hi there,
I am not sure if this is considered a bug. I am a Gentoo user, everything is
built from source there. So it's important to know the dependencies of a
package. For ddd, elfutils is not in the dependency tree, because it also
builds fine without it. But if it is available anyway, ddd does link to
libelf.
So, when cleaning up unneeded packages, Gentoo lists elfutils as a package
nothing depends on, but then realizes that the ddd binray links to libelf
nevertheless, and complains.
This is no serious problem, but it's not nice as well, giving the users some
confusing output.
So, a solution might be some --with[out]-elf switch for the configure script
to control usage of libelf. I do not know what libelf is being used for, what
is needed instead if it if not available, and if there also should be a switch
for that.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?27945>
_______________________________________________
Nachricht geschickt von/durch Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [bug #27945] control over including libelf,
Alex Schuster <=