[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-ddrescue] Feature request - ddrescue
From: |
Antonio Diaz Diaz |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-ddrescue] Feature request - ddrescue |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Aug 2007 11:48:27 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:1.7.11) Gecko/20050905 |
Seems this message got lost, so I resend it.
Dave Burton wrote:
However, if you simply overwrite a failing drive with all zero
sectors (which is what the manufacturers' utilities do), the
drive might remap the bad sectors, and it might (temporarily)
appear to be a good drive.
John Gilmore uses GNU ddrescue to remap the bad sectors just as you
suggest. See it here http://www.toad.com/gnu/sysadmin/index.html#ddrescue
So I wanted a disk wiper program which would zero out only the
good sectors, and leave the bad sectors alone. That way, the
drive will still test bad (i.e., with unreadable sectors).
It seems it would be useful to make ddrescue able to overwrite good or
bad sectors in the original drive or, as Christian Franke suggested here
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-ddrescue/2007-06/msg00002.html, in
the copy (to make bad sectors easily recognizable when examined with an
hex editor).
I propose the addition of a new option to ddrescue, "--fill", with an
argument telling it what sectors to fill. For example:
ddrescue --fill=+ /dev/zero /dev/hdb logfile
would write with zeros the sectors of /dev/hdb listed as good (+) in
logfile, and:
echo 'BAD SECTOR' > tmpfile
ddrescue --fill=- tmpfile drive_copy logfile
would fill with the string "BAD SECTOR" the sectors of drive_copy listed
as bad (-) in logfile.
What do you think?
Regards,
Antonio.