bug-ddrescue
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-ddrescue] Testdisk sees what ddrescue does not


From: andrew zajac
Subject: Re: [Bug-ddrescue] Testdisk sees what ddrescue does not
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:16:15 -0700 (PDT)

I try not to interrupt a rescue that is spitting out data unless I have a really good reason to do so.

There's lots you can do without writing to the image, though.  If you mount the image as read-only then you can attempt to read some files from it right now, on-the-fly, without writing to it with Testdisk.  But I certainly would not try to repair the filesystem at this point.



--- On Sun, 6/14/09, Ken A Scott <address@hidden> wrote:

From: Ken A Scott <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [Bug-ddrescue] Testdisk sees what ddrescue does not
To: address@hidden
Received: Sunday, June 14, 2009, 3:06 PM

Hi guys,
Thanks for the help and encouragement.  The imaging of the drive is going well (saved ~45 Gb so far with less 1% errors and clipping along at about 1MB per sec after I added -c 64 and -d qualifiers to ddrescue) .  Given that the entire drive 250GB was not close to full the question is can I stop ddrescue at some point, make a copy of what I have so far, and perform testdisk, fsck, and mount etc. to that copy?
I know that would cost me whatever data might have been spread out into the last unimaged portion of the original NTFS partition but would it even work?
 
In other words, can effective repairs be performed on a image of a portion of a NTFS  partition?
 
Even if this idea is faulty I can always resume the ddrescue where I left off. 
Thanks
Ken
 
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 09:30 -0700, "andrew zajac" <address@hidden> wrote:
It's far from useless.  You can image the drive and mount the partition on the image using an offset.

Assuming you imaged the drive (sdb) to a file named "image" in the current directory, you can do:

mkdir mnt
sudo mount -t ntfs -o r,loop,offset=32256 file mnt

See here for more details:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/DataRecovery#Mounting%20partitions%20on%20the%20image


--- On Fri, 6/12/09, Ken A Scott <address@hidden> wrote:

From: Ken A Scott <address@hidden>
Subject: [Bug-ddrescue] Testdisk sees what ddrescue does not
To: address@hidden
Received: Friday, June 12, 2009, 2:45 PM

I have a troubled disk which won't mount in Linux (or boot up to XP which is what it is).  The 'testdisk' utility correctly indentifies the partitions
(a large 233GB NTFS Windows partition and a small 11GB recovery partition =>  total size 250GB)
and can show actual files on on the windows partition but can't write the partition table to the disk.  ddrescue 1.2-1.3 (on a MEPIS system) with the following command    $ddrescue --no-split  /dev/sdb1  imagefile logfile
says
'cannot open input file:No such file or directory'
 
Since cat /proc/partitions shows a sdb entry  '8  16   244198584'  I was able to start the above command with just
$ddrescue --no-split  /dev/sdb  imagefile logfile
but I'm not sure if it is useful (since I know there to be actually two partitions there).
 
Any advice?
Thanks in advance!
Ken
 
-- 
Ken A Scott
address@hidden

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
Bug-ddrescue mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-ddrescue


The new Internet Explorer® 8 - Faster, safer, easier. Optimized for Yahoo! Get it Now for Free!
-- 
Ken A Scott
address@hidden

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
Bug-ddrescue mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-ddrescue


Yahoo! Canada Toolbar : Search from anywhere on the web and bookmark your favourite sites. Download it now!


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]