|
From: | Antonio Diaz Diaz |
Subject: | Re: [Bug-ddrescue] Merging two images from the same recovery.... |
Date: | Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:02:18 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:1.7.11) Gecko/20050905 |
Hello Mike, Dependable-Mike wrote:
Your assumptions were spot on, and your instructions clear. However, the command I ran on dir2 was slightly different... something like: sudo ddrescue -i60G -v -n -a300k /dev/sdb image.iso recovery.log which was identical to the first capture (dir1), apart from the extra -i60G bit (which is only in the dir2 version). That means that my image in dir1 is 149GB whereas the image in dir2 is only 40GB (and is all data above 60G point). I'm assuming that the respective
I think there is an error here. "ddrescue -i60G" will always produce an image file larger than 60G. If the image in dir2 is only 40GB large, you ran out of disk space or didn't really typed the -i60G (or ddrescue has a bug).
logfiles will automatically merge the files at the right points and know that the 40GB image fits in somewhere after 60G itself without needing any input from me, and therefore your commands as written in your example above still apply...
With -i60G ddrescue leaves the first 60GB untouched and writes to the image from there. Ddrescue does not relocate one image after the other.
At this point maybe it is better to continue the rescue in dir1 without trying to merge the image from dir2.
Regards, Antonio.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |