Re: [Bug-ddrescue] 2 Suggestions (bi-directional retry and user interruption exit code)

[Scott Dwyer]

On 2/25/2014 8:21 AM, Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote:
> I forgot to add the line
> #include <csignal>
>
> You may also need a fake "return 0;" after the "std::raise( SIGINT );"
>
> Remember that this patch is just a hack only good for a quick test. It 
> is not correct code. 
A very quick test on Fedora with the hacked code seemed to do the trick. 
Although I still don't have my code the proper way either.

So the compiler obviously needs the "return 0;" to be happy,  but the 
program actually exits on the "std::raise( SIGINT );"?
Curious thought, a normal exit will free memory and close open files 
that were missed by an inexperienced programmer like me. But will this 
style exit do the same?

Scott