Re: htags: status line could show better status line

[Yann Dirson - LOGATIQUE]

On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 06:49:34PM +0900, Shigio Yamaguchi wrote:
> Short of information is no problem but wrong information becomes harm, I 
> think.

Yes.  Maybe add some information in GTAGS, if made available by the tagger, 
about
the scope of the reference ?  Indeed that would just extend the current
information that only gives the filename, replacing file.c with things like
file.c::myclass::myprivateclass::aMethod::privatefunc may not require much
modifications to the current code.


> > Easy - these are the references to "assert" in m4.  It would be nice to see 
> > which
> > function they belong to.
> 
> Sorry, I didn't understand the difference from your previous suggestion.
> What should we show in the status line?

Well, here I did not thought to add anything to the status line, just add one
more field to each entry in the list.

Regards,
-- 
      /\       Yann Dirson                      <address@hidden>
     \\ \
    \ \\ /     Sun Microsystems Inc.               <http://www.sun.com/>
   / \/ / /    ChorusOS Support
  / /   \//\
  \//\   / /   Phone: +33 139 44 74 50
   / / /\ /    Phone: 44450           
    / \\ \
     \ \\
      \/       Subcontractant from Logatique  <http://www.logatique.fr/>